Spies and Saboteurs

I had a conversation with Tananarive about dealing with political opponents on my page. My attitude is that I have to deal with them from a primarily philosophical position, and have no taste for banning them just because they vote for someone else. As I think these are extraordinary times, I do admit that there is greater pressure, and I have to take that seriously — but refuse to let it change me. I know that is part of what some of them want: to either exploit what they see as a loophole, or drag me down into a world where lies are better than the truth.

Is it true? No. Is it useful? You betcha.

So I know that there are people who try to take advantage of that, appealing to a sense of fair play in order to convey their message, or sow discord. And I have to deal with that. We must be who we are, and not allow the world to change us to something we are not.

For instance: some people will show up and point out a perceived flaw in your candidate or side. If this flaw is exclusive to him, or to your side, it is rational to point this out (“What is true?”) but if it is not, if they ignore equal or greater flaws on their own side, in their own candidate, then it is not philosophy, it is politics (“how can I win?”).

If wearing the colors of their team openly, that is honorable. But if they pretend to be neutral, or even on your side, they are in essence spies. Saboteurs.

So if I am a Y, and this is an X and presents himself as such, this person might be told a thread or…